Project Information

Bid Title

WT25052/HSIPL-5008(226) REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) SYSTEMIC INTERSECTION SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Provide professional consultant services to design intersection safety improvements at three intersections and provide assistance during the construction phase of the project.

Issuing Agency

City of Stockton

Location

California

Published Date

Mar 2, 2026

Closing Date

Mar 30, 2026

Government Level

State & Local

Status

Closed

Ref. #

WT25052/HSIPL-5008(226)

Original Source

Join to Access Full Details

Bid Inquiries

Join to Access Full Details

Bid Documents

Join to Access Full Details

Project Description

General Information
Due Date:	Monday March 30, 2026
Opening Time:	3:00 PM
Published Date:	Monday, March 2, 2026
Last Updated:	Monday, March 2, 2026
Bid Orientation:	N/A
Description:	REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SYSTEMIC INTERSECTION SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. WT25052 / FEDERAL PROJECT NO. HSIPL-5008(226) Provide professional consultant services to design intersection safety improvements at three intersections and provide assistance during the construction phase of the project. March Lane at Red Russo Drive March Land and Precissi Lane Hammer Lane and Montauban Avenue Consultant must be familiar with the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), and Carbon Reduction Program Local (CRPL) funded projects, Caltrans Local Assistance Programs Guidelines (LAPG) and Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM).  Likewise, the Consultant and Consultant Staff must demonstrate recent design experience on similar projects.
Award Date:

Related Links
Description:	URL:
Insurance Requirements	link
Construction/Demolition/Recycling Plan/Report	link
Federal Wage Rates	link
Prevailing Wages (2025-2)	link

Contacts
Role:	Name:	Phone:	Email:
Project Manager	Evan Banister	(209) 937-8299	Evan.Bannister@stocktonca.gov
Backup	Wes Johnson	(209) 937-8088	Wes.Johnson@stocktonca.gov
Plan Holder's List	Dawn Clement	(209) 937-8226	Dawn.Clement@stocktonca.gov

Letter of Clarification:
	There are no Letters of Clarification documents available at this time.

Questions & Answers:
	There are no Questions & Answers documents available at this time.

Submittals
	There are no Submittal documents available at this time.

Job Walk
	There are no Job Walk documents available at this time.

Plan Holder's List
	There are no Plan Holder's Lists available at this time.

Notice
Document:	Request for Proposals

Plans, Attachments & Agendas
ATTACHMENT A	Vicinity Map
ATTACHMENT B	Acknowledgement of Monument Preservation Form
ATTACHMENT C	Instructions to Proposers - Federally Funded Contracts
ATTACHMENT D	Federal Aid Consultant Contract Provisions
ATTACHMENT E	Sample Cost Proposal (Exhibit 10-H1 in Local Assistance Manual)
ATTACHMENT F	Evaluation Scoring Sheet
Document:	Project Insurance Requirements

Last Update :

Attachment Preview

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

FOR THE

SYSTEMIC INTERSECTION SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS

City Project No. WT25052

Federal Project No. HSIPL-5008(226)

Issued by:

City of Stockton

Public Works Department

501 W. Weber Avenue

Building 2, 3rd Floor

Stockton, CA 95203

Date Issued:

Written Questions Due:

Date Proposals Due:

Monday, March 2, 2026

Wednesday, March 18, 2026

Monday, March 30, 2026, 3:00 P.M.

Late Submittals Will Not Be Accepted

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The City of Stockton (City) requests a Technical Proposal from qualified consulting firms

to provide professional consultant services to design intersection safety improvements at

three intersections: March Lane at Fred Russo Drive, March Lane and Precissi Lane, and

Hammer Lane and Montauban Avenue. A selection committee will comprehensively rank

firms based on, but not limited to, proposals, qualifications, references, and other relevant

information.

The Consultant must be familiar with the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP),

and Carbon Reduction Program Local (CRPL) funded projects, Caltrans Local Assistance

Programs Guidelines (LAPG) and Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM).

Likewise, the Consultant and Consultant staff must demonstrate recent design

experience on similar projects. The consultant shall also provide assistance during the

construction phase of the project.

2.0 BACKGROUND

The City recently secured HSIP funds for the design and construction of multiple

intersection safety improvements at three intersections: March Lane at Fred Russo Drive,

March Lane and Precissi Lane, and Hammer Lane and Montauban Avenue. This HSIP

project was identified as a high-priority project through the City's recently completed

Systemic Safety Analysis Report and Local Road Safety Plan (SSAR/LRSP) analysis and

findings. This SSAR/LRSP report is a data-driven evaluation of traffic safety improvement

needs and sets forth a vision and goals specific to roadway safety performance.

The Hammer Lane/Montauban Avenue intersection had 26 broadside collisions, possibly

due to ‘large box’ commercial uses (e.g., Costco and Honda, Acura, and Toyota

dealerships). Congestion is often high along Montauban Avenue and protected left turn

signals and improved visibility crosswalks are needed to eliminate collisions. In addition,

parents and children of Clairmont Elementary School utilize Montauban Avenue as one

of their main commuting thoroughfares.

March Lane/Precissi Lane recorded two fatalities involving a bicyclist and a pedestrian,

with seven collisions involving pedestrians and/or bicyclists at or near the intersection

within the last five years. University of the Pacific’s Monagan Hall and Delta College are

on opposite sides of March Lane. Many pedestrians and bicyclists use Precissi Lane as

the main thoroughfare connecting the two campuses.

March Lane/Fred Russo Drive recorded nine broadside collisions involving left-turn

movements. In addition, two pedestrians and three bicyclists were injured in collisions

with motorists at the intersection. Though this intersection's surrounding land-use is

residential, there are two elementary schools, a high school, and two public parks near

and Fred Russo Drive is the main thoroughfare to March Lane. Congestion is often high

at this intersection, and many children walk or bike along Fred Russo Drive to school or

parks.

Request for Proposals

Systemic Intersection Safety Improvements

Project No. WT25052 / HSIPL-5008(226)

Page 2 of 14

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The proposed project involves installing protected left-turn signal heads, larger signal

lens, retro-reflective back-plates, high reflectivity lane and crosswalk markings, traffic

video detection system, and Accessible Pedestrian Signals & near side signal heads at

select locations. (See Attachment A – Vicinity Map).

4.0 SCOPE OF WORK

Each consultant shall prepare a detailed scope of services for the design of this project

based, in part and at a minimum, on information presented in this Request for Proposal,

and other available information. The consultant shall provide a cost proposal, which

accomplishes the objectives of the project.

The consultant shall incorporate in their design the installation of the protected left-turn

signal heads, larger signal lens, retro-reflective back-plates, high reflectivity lane and

crosswalk markings, traffic video detection system, and Accessible Pedestrian Signals &

near side signal heads.

These intersection improvements propose to address intersection, pedestrian and

bicyclist safety concerns by installing 1) protected left-turn signals, 2) larger signal heads,

3) high-visibility thermoplastic crosswalk, lane, and limit line markings, 4) Accessible

Pedestrian Signals (APS) and Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Programming, and 5)

video detection systems for actuation.

Consultants are encouraged to include items that are thought necessary for this project.

4.1 Background Research

The consultant shall research and review existing topographic mapping, photos,

right of way maps, “as-built” plans, record maps, surveys, assessor maps, local

street improvement plans, collision reports, sight distance, approach speed, total

pedestrians and vehicle volumes, public transit routes, grade, need of advance

warning signs and flashers, and other geometrical and operational characteristics

for the project.

The Consultant shall conduct field reconnaissance of the entire project limits. The

Consultant shall work with all pertinent utilities to identify conflicts, coordinate utility

plan reviews, conduct necessary coordination meetings, and locate designed

improvements as required to facilitate any utility relocations. The consultant will

need to coordinate with the City to the maximum extent possible to route this

information to utility companies. Consultant must show all existing utilities that will

be impacted or cause impact by the proposed project. The consultant is responsible

for arranging and coordinating with all utility companies, within the project sphere, to

resolve any utility issues.

Request for Proposals

Systemic Intersection Safety Improvements

Project No. WT25052 / HSIPL-5008(226)

Page 3 of 14

The Consultant shall identify required permits, prepare all permit applications, and

assist the City with negotiations relative to permit conditions, if required. Permit fees

will be paid by the City.

4.2 Environmental Services

The project is funded with federal funds, and therefore California Environmental

Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance is

required through Caltrans District 10 Office of Local Assistance. The consultant shall

be responsible for coordinating with Caltrans and Stakeholders as needed, including

completion of the Preliminary Environmental Study (PES). Consultant will prepare

any studies that Caltrans requires in the approved PES.

The consultant shall be responsible for printing, mailing, delivering, and distributing

to appropriate Agencies and Stakeholders to obtain environmental clearance.

4.3 Utility Coordination

The consultant will be responsible for performing utility investigations and

coordination with utility owners throughout the project development process. The

Consultant will be present at all necessary meetings with each utility owner. The

consultant will be responsible for, but not limited to, the following:

• Prepare a project limits map and request utility information from each utility owner

within the area of work.

• Consultant will use data provided by utility companies and perform field work

such as potholing, ground penetrating radar, or other technology to confirm depth

information. This field work should be performed as soon as possible so that

conflicts can be identified, and utility companies can be notified of any necessary

relocation.

• Prepare Utility Letter “A” during preliminary design phase to the affected utility

owners for City to review and approve prior to transmitting to utility owners.

Information on existing utilities obtained as a result of the “A” letter will be

transferred to base maps in both plan and profile view. A copy of the utility data

obtained from utility owners will be provided to the City and the originals will be

filed in the project files.

• Prepare Utility Letter “B” during 65% design phase to the affected utility owners

for City to review and approve prior to transmitting to utility owners. Two sets of

half-sized 65% plans will be provided to each utility owner as an attachment to

the letter. The letter will request that utility owners verify any utility conflicts with

proposed improvements and indicate whether any future utilities are proposed in

the area that may require accommodation through the improved area.

Information on existing utilities obtained as a result of the “B” letter will be used

to determine potential utility conflicts and to resolve the conflicts identified. A copy

Request for Proposals

Systemic Intersection Safety Improvements

Project No. WT25052 / HSIPL-5008(226)

Page 4 of 14

of the utility data obtained from utility owners will be provided to the City and the

originals will be filed in the project files.

• Prepare Utility Letter “C” during 100% design phase to the affected utility owners

for City to review and approve prior to transmitting to utility owners. Two sets of

half-sized 100% plans will be provided to each utility owner as an attachment to

the letter. The letter will indicate to the utility owners whether any changes have

been made to the project plans since the Utility Letter “B” and will request written

confirmation of utility relocations and utility relocation schedule. A copy of the

utility data obtained from utility owners will be provided to the City and the

originals will be filed in the project files.

• Consultant shall meet with utility companies as needed to ensure that conflicts

are identified and relocations performed if necessary.

4.4 Plans, Specifications, and Estimate

The Consultant shall prepare complete PS&E documents, which include design

improvement plans, traffic control plans, electrical plans, drainage plans, technical

specifications, and engineer’s estimate. The PS&E shall be prepared according to

the City’s standards and current CA MUTCD, as appropriate. Consultant shall use

modeling software to determine acceptable Level of Service (LOS) and geometric

layout and submit recommendations to City for concurrence. Prepare a base map

showing existing information to facilitate the design of all the necessary

improvements. The base map limits shall be sufficient to cover all necessary

improvements within the project area.

A. Intersection Safety Design Process – Intermediate Reviews

Improvement plans for safety additions and striping, roadway, drainage,

electrical, erosion control and or water pollution prevention and miscellaneous

plans shall be submitted for review to the City at 30%, 65%, 90% and 100%

completion stage. The Consultant will provide one electronic (PDF format). With

each stage, the review comments from the previous stage shall be itemized and

a written response to each shall be prepared in a comment matrix. The original

red-line comments from the reviewing agency shall be returned with the

succeeding submittal.

Consultant shall provide a project specification outline and project estimates at

the 65% submittal and complete project estimate and specification at 100%

submittal.

1. Preliminary 30% Design

At a minimum the 30% design should include a basic geometric

configuration of roadway striping layouts, curb alignments at round corner

improvements, and typical cross sections. Consultant to consider turning

motions of nearby schools and residential homes, Stockton Fire

Request for Proposals

Systemic Intersection Safety Improvements

Project No. WT25052 / HSIPL-5008(226)

Page 5 of 14

Commodity Codes

• NAICS 236220Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
• NAICS 541330Engineering Services
• NAICS 541611Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
• NAICS 541690Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services
• NAICS 541990All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

* Disclaimer: Government BidHub provides information on bids, RFPs (Requests for Proposals), and RFQs (Requests for Qualifications) solely for convenience and informational purposes. This site is not an official public notice board. For official details, responses, or inquiries, please contact the relevant government agency directly.