Project Information

Bid Title

RFP No. 015-25/26 -?Security Guard Services Districtwide Addendum No. 1

Issuing Agency

Glendale Unified School District

Location

California

Published Date

Apr 16, 2026

Closing Date

Apr 23, 2026

Government Level

State & Local

Status

Closed

Original Source

Join to Access Full Details

Bid Inquiries

Join to Access Full Details

Bid Documents

Join to Access Full Details

Project Description

RFP No. 015-25/26 – Security Guard Services Districtwide

• Notice Inviting Bids
• Request for Proposal (RFP)
• Addendum No. 1

Attachment Preview

GLENDALE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

OFFICE OF PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACT SERVICES

223 N. Jackson Street, Glendale, CA 91206

Phone: 818-241-3111 | Fax: 818-548-9041

www.gusd.net | @GlendaleUSD

ADDENDUM NO. 1

April 7, 2026

Request for Proposal: GLENDALE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

SECURITY GUARD SERVICES DISTRICTWIDE

RFP 015-25/26

This addendum forms part of the contract documents and may modify the original bidding

documents. Any revision, clarifications, deletions and/or additions shall be made to the bid

documents for RFP 015-25/26. It is mandatory to acknowledge receipt of this addendum by

inserting its number in the location provided on the Bid Form Schedule page 8 of the original bid

package.

RESPONSE TO REQUESTS FOR CLARIFICATION/QUESTIONS:

1.​ Question: INFORMATION FOR BIDDERS Section 25 provides, “Services Needed The

District has five (5) high schools and four (4) middle schools, one (1) education center, and

various sites." Additionally, Section 26 provides, “Services Needed The District twenty-one

(21) school sites and various sites” Page 25 – 26, Section A. Representative Assignment

Locations, lists 21 elementary schools. Please advise if this scope of work is exclusively for

the 21 elementary schools.

Response: Section 25 - Services needed at five (5) high Schools and four (4) middle

schools, twenty-one (21) elementary Schools, and one (1) education center. Section 26 -

thirty (30) School Sites, one (1) education center, and various sites as needed.

In addition to the Elementary Schools identified in the original RFP, the following four (4)

Middle Schools, five (5) High Schools, and one (1) Education Center shall also require

security services under this contract:

Middle Schools

Theodore Roosevelt Middle School

Rosemont Middle School

Eleanor J. Toll Middle School

Woodrow Wilson Middle School

High Schools

Anderson W. Clark Magnet High School

Crescenta Valley High School

Glendale High School

Herbert Hoover High School

Allan F. Daily High School

Education Center

Pacific Avenue Preschool Programs

2.​ Question: Regarding Section 13 of the sample contract, can the Agreement be revised to

give the Contractor the reciprocal right to terminate the Contract for convenience subject to

90 calendar days’ prior written notice to the District?

Response: Proposal should be submitted based on RFP bid document. At the District’s

discretion, this request may be discussed with the awarded bidder.

3.​ Question: Our company stands by our security services and regularly accepts the obligation

to indemnify clients for the comparative portion of any losses, costs or damages that are

caused by the negligent acts or omissions of our personnel in the performance of security

services under client agreements. Will the District revise the indemnification provision to

limit coverage of indemnified claims to the proportionate extent of the Contractor’s

negligence?

Response: Please refer to Section 9 of General Contract. Vendor agrees to defend, indemnify

and hold harmless the District, its Governing Board, employees and agents from any and all

liability or loss arising in any way out of Vendor's performance of this agreement,

including but not limited to any claim due to injury and/or damage sustained by Vendor,

and/or Vendor's employees or agents. The contract terms will remain as written in the RFP.

4.​ Question: Our company stands behind our security services, however, the pricing presented

does not take into account infinite liability. Is the District willing to add a replace Article 6

mutual a limitation on liability such as the following? “NOTWITHSTANDING ANY

OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT, AND TO THE FULLEST EXTENT

PERMITTED BY LAW NEITHER PARTY SHALL BE LIABLE TO EACH OTHER FOR

ANY SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, PUNITIVE, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL

DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOSS OF PROFITS OR REVENUE,

LOSS OF USE, LOSS OF OPPORTUNITY, LOSS OF GOODWILL, GOODS OR

SERVICES, COST OF CAPITAL, GOVERNMENTAL AND REGULATORY

SANCTIONS, AND CLAIMS OF CUSTOMERS FOR SUCH DAMAGES. THE TOTAL

CUMULATIVE LIABILITY OF EITHER PARTY FOR ALL CLAIMS, LOSSES,

DAMAGES, AND EXPENSES RESULTING IN ANY WAY FROM THE

PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT, SHALL NOT BE GREATER THAN THE

COMPENSATION RECEIVED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT.”

Response: All bidders are expected to price their services based on the terms and conditions

provided in the original RFP. Please ensure your proposal reflects the ability to meet the

insurance and indemnification requirements as stated.

END OF ADDENDUM NO. 1

Commodity Codes

• NAICS 561612Security Guards and Patrol Services

* Disclaimer: Government BidHub provides information on bids, RFPs (Requests for Proposals), and RFQs (Requests for Qualifications) solely for convenience and informational purposes. This site is not an official public notice board. For official details, responses, or inquiries, please contact the relevant government agency directly.