Project Information

Bid Title

North Towers Renovations

Issuing Agency

Ohio Facility Construction Commission

Location

Ohio

Published Date

May 11, 2026

Closing Date

Jun 4, 2026

Government Level

State & Local

Status

Closed

Ref. #

OSU-250125

Original Source

Join to Access Full Details

Bid Inquiries

Join to Access Full Details

Bid Documents

Join to Access Full Details

Project Description

Publish Date	Due Date	Number	Owner	Contractring Authority	Project Name	Primary Service	Estimated Project Cost	Q&A	Short List	Notes
2026/05/11	2026/06/04	OSU-250125	The Ohio State University	Local Higher Education	North Towers Renovations	CxA	$163,000,000	N/A	TBD

Attachment Preview

Request for Qualifications (Commissioning Agent)

State of Ohio Standard Forms and Documents

Administration of Project: Local Higher Education

Project Name North Towers Renovations

Drackett Tower (0189), Jones Tower

Project Location (0267), Taylor Tower (0268)

City / County Columbus/ Franklin

Owner

The Ohio State University

Delivery Method Construction Manager at Risk

No. of paper copies requested (stapled, not bound)

0

Response Deadline 06/4/2026

2:00 PM local time

Project Number

OSU-250125

Project Manager

Todd Henderly

Contracting Authority Local Higher Education

Prevailing Wages State

No. of electronic copies requested on CD (PDF)

1

Submit the Statements of Qualifications (Form F110-330) via email to:

North_Towers_Renovation_Study_-_Jones_Taylor_and_D.01_Selection3@docs.e-builder.net

In the subject line, include the project number and name for the RFQ you are responding to. See Section H of this RFQ for

additional submittal instructions.

Submit all questions regarding this RFQ in writing to Todd Henderly at henderly.8@osu.edu with the project number included

in the subject line (no phone calls please). Questions will be answered and posted to Opportunities page on the OFCC website

at Project Opportunities on a regular basis until one week before the response deadline. The name of the party submitting a

question will not be included on the Q&A document.

Project Overview

A. Project Description

The Ohio State University is soliciting qualifications from Commissioning Agent firms to provide commissioning services

for the upcoming renovation of Taylor, Drackett, and Jones Towers.

These three 13-story residence halls, each approximately 130,000 SF, were constructed in the 1960s using reinforced

concrete structures with brick and masonry exteriors and low floor to floor heights.

Project Scope

The primary objective of this project is to address deferred maintenance by replacing aging mechanical, electrical,

plumbing, and fire protection systems. In addition, the project will include interior renovations and upgrades to student-

occupied floors and common spaces, enhancing the overall residential experience.

This project is required to be constructed and delivered within a collaborative BIM-enabled environment following The

Ohio State University BIM Project Delivery Standards.

This project is required to deliver asset tagging within a collaborative BIM-enabled environment. The Primary firm

submitting for the project will be required to have the expertise capable of meeting this requirement and is responsible to

support their subcontractors to meet this requirement. The Asset Tagging Workflow and the OSU PDS Tools can be

accessed via the OSU FOD website (https://fod.osu.edu/resources) under Design Guidelines, Specifications, Standards;

Specifications and Standards; Building Information Modeling (BIM).

B. Scope of Services

The CxA will be involved from the design phase through warranty phase. The CxA will be responsible for helping to

document, create and review the Owner’s Project Requirements as it relates to the buildings energy performance, and to

provide input on the Basis of Design through reviews and interaction with the AOR, University Architect, University

Engineering, Facilities Operations and Development, and the AOR Engineers. The primary role of the CxA during the

overall design phase is to develop detailed commissioning specifications, and to review design to ensure it meets the

OSU office of Student Life objectives as well as The Ohio State University’s Sustainable Design and Construction Policy.

During construction, the CxA coordinates the execution of a testing plan, which includes observing and documenting all

systems’ performance to ensure that systems are functioning in accordance with the Owner’s objectives and the contract

documents. The CxA is not responsible for design or general construction scheduling, cost estimating, or construction

management, but it may be necessary to assist with problem solving non-conformance issues and deficiencies. The CxA

will be required to provide input on the overall master schedule where they are to perform tasks.

F130-08-2015-OCT

Publish Date: 5/11/2026

Page 1 of 5

Request for Qualifications (Commissioning Agent) continued

The objective of commissioning is to provide documented confirmation that a facility fulfills the functional and performance

requirements of the building owner (Student Life), including but not limited to fundamentals contained within Climate

Action Plan, The Ohio State University’s Sustainable Design and Construction Policy, and Integrated Energy &

Environmental Implementation Strategies. To reach this goal it is necessary for the commissioning process to develop

and document the owner’s criteria for system function, performance, and maintainability, as well as to verify document

compliance with these criteria throughout design, construction, start-up, initial operation and seasonal operation. In

addition, complete electronic operation and maintenance (O&M) manuals, as well as training on system operations should

be provided to the building operators to ensure the building continues to operate as intended. The Commissioning Agent

(CxA) will develop the Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR).

The University is committed to commissioning this facility to ensure that all systems are integrated, fully functional, and

optimized for performance upon occupancy and throughout all seasonal cycles. A primary objective is the maximization of

energy conservation to ensure strict compliance with the Sustainable Design and Construction Policy.

The Commissioning Agent (CxA) shall provide comprehensive design review comments, generate commissioning

specifications for inclusion in the Construction Documents, and develop a project-specific Commissioning Plan. The CxA

is responsible for verifying that all systems meet the Basis of Design (BOD) and Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR).

The building systems to be commissioned include, but are not limited to:

• HVAC Systems: All generation, distribution, and terminal equipment, including air handling units, hydronic systems,

and exhaust fans.

• Building Automation System (BAS) & Lighting Controls: Comprehensive review and field-testing of sequences of

operations, setpoints, and scheduling to ensure peak efficiency and occupant comfort.

• Electrical & Life Safety: Normal and emergency power distribution, grounding, and the functional integration of the

Fire Alarm system with HVAC smoke control/dampers.

• Plumbing: Domestic hot and cold water systems, mixing valves, recirculation pumps, and any specialized water

conservation systems.

This project will also include building enclosure commissioning (BECx). They will be responsible for commissioning the

building enclosure to validate that it meets the design intent in the documents and comply with the University’s

Sustainable Design and Construction Policy. They will review and provide design review comments of the drawings and

specifications related to building enclosure systems, including the detailing of all components. They will also review

contractors shop drawings and samples that are relevant to the building enclosure for conformance with University and

industry standards, as well as observe and comment upon any exterior enclosure mock-ups.

As part of the proposal, the BECx shall recommend and include any and all tests necessary to fully commission the

building enclosure as part of their proposal. These diagnostic procedures shall specifically address the primary

components of the envelope: the 13-story curtain wall, new punched windows, brick tuckpointing, and rain screen

assemblies. Testing must verify air/ thermal infiltration as well as water penetration resistance for all fenestration

protocols.

For Taylor Tower, the CxA Team shall engage an independent third-party roof consultant to conduct periodic inspections

of key roofing components. The consultant will verify that all materials and assemblies are installed in strict accordance

with contract plans, project specifications, Building Design Standards, and manufacturer-validated installation methods.

Regarding Drackett Tower, which recently underwent a roof replacement, the scope is limited to the inspection of any new

roof curbs and/or penetrations to ensure proper flashing and installation.

To maintain high standards of workmanship, the frequency of these inspections shall remain adaptive rather than fixed.

The consultant’s site presence will be determined by the complexity of the specific assembly being installed and the

demonstrated proficiency of the roofing contractor. For example, high-risk transitions, flashing details, and initial mock-ups

may require daily oversight, whereas standard field applications may allow for a reduced cadence. Ultimately, the

consultant must provide sufficient coverage to ensure comprehensive compliance, scaling their site visits based on the

contractor's real-time performance and the critical nature of the active work phases.

Finally, the Commissioning Agent shall be responsible for procuring, coordinating, and validating the final Testing,

Adjusting, and Balancing (TAB) report. To ensure a seamless transition to project closeout, the Commissioning Agent

must furnish the final certified TAB and commissioning reports to the General Contractor in advance of their scheduled

final inspections. Delivery of these validated reports is a prerequisite for the AHJ (Authority Having Jurisdiction)

inspections and the successful procurement of the Certificate of Occupancy. As part of these services, the TAB contractor

and CxA shall outline minimum building requirements necessary to conduct and complete the TAB scope as well as to

adequately staff the job so that each building’s TAB can be completed in approximately 3 weeks time start to finish.

Regarding Jones Tower, the University is proceeding with the demolition of the facility. At this time, it is not anticipated

that the CxA will be required to provide services for this building.

F130-08-2015-OCT

Publish Date: [leave blank]

Page 2 of 5

Request for Qualifications (Commissioning Agent) continued

The selected CxA, as a portion of its required Scope of Services and prior to submitting its proposals, will discuss and

clarify with the Owner and/or the Contracting Authority, the cost breakdown of the Consultant Agreement detailed cost

components to address the Owner’s project requirements. Participate in the Encouraging Growth, Diversity & Equity

(“EDGE”) Program as required by statute and the Agreement.

The CxA may be responsible for contracting with an outside firm for independent testing and balancing of systems.

The project team (Owner / A/E / CxA / Contractor) will be required to utilize e-Builder, the University’s Project

Management System, for all compatible services required by the University.

The project shall follow the applicable University Sustainability Standards. https://fod.osu.edu/sites/default/files/div_18.pdf.

The Commissioning Agent shall review, comment, and participant in all aspects of the standards applicable to their scope

of work.

Closeout Services: The closeout for this project is required to be delivered in an electronic cloud-based format using e-

Builder Project Management System and adhere to The Ohio State University Project Closeout Standards. The Ohio

State University Project Closeout Standards can be accessed via the OSU FOD vender resource website

(https://fod.osu.edu/resources) under Post Construction / Close Out.

For purposes of completing the Relevant Project Experience Matrix in Section F of the Statement of Qualifications (Form

F110-330), below is a list of relevant scope of work requirements for this RFQ:

1. Experience in the operations and troubleshooting of building control systems, and MEP systems

2. Experience in writing commissioning specifications

3. Experience managing Testing Air Balance and Roof Inspection protocols for OSU

For the purpose of the selection of 10 Relevant Projects in Section F of the Statement of Qualification (Form F110-330),

projects must have been completed by the Commissioning Firm.

C. Funding / Estimated Budget

Total Project Cost (TPC) $163,000,000

Construction Cost

$135,000,000

Estimated CxA Fee

.004% to .005%

State Funding $0

Other Funding $163,000,000

NOTE: The CxA fee percentage for this project includes all professional design services, and consultant services necessary for proper completion

of the commissioning services for the successful completion of the project.

D. Services Required (see note below)

E. Anticipated Schedule

Primary

Secondary

MEP Commissioning

Building Envelope Commissioning

Roof Consultant / Commissioning

Professional Services Start

Construction Notice to Proceed

Substantial Completion of all Work

Professional Services Completed

06 / 2026

07 / 2026

09 / 2028

10 / 2028

F. EDGE Participation Goal

Others

Testing Air Balance

Percent of initial TOTAL CxA Fee

5%

G. Evaluation Criteria for Selection

• Demonstrated ability to meet Owner’s project requirements.

• Demonstrated ability to meet Owner’s Sustainability Standards: https://fod.osu.edu/sites/default/files/div_18.pdf.

• Previous experience compatible with the proposed project (e.g., type, size).

• Relevant past work of prospective firm’s proposed consultants.

• Past performance of prospective firm and its proposed consultants.

• Qualifications and experience of individuals directly involved with the project.

• Proximity of prospective firms to the project site.

F130-08-2015-OCT

Publish Date: [leave blank]

Page 3 of 5

Request for Qualifications (Commissioning Agent) continued

• Proposer’s apparent resources and capacity to meet the needs of this project.

Interested CxA firms are required to submit the Commitment to Participate in the EDGE Business Assistance Program

form in its Statement of Qualifications (Form F110-330) submitted in response to the RFQ, to indicate its intent to contract

with and use EDGE-certified Business Enterprise(s), as a part of the CxA’s team. The Intent to Contract and to Perform

and / or waiver request letter and Demonstration of Good Faith Effort form(s) with complete documentation must be

attached to the CxA’s Technical Proposal. Both forms can be accessed via the OFCC website at Procurement Forms. The

Intent to Contract and to Perform form is again required at the Fee Proposal stage.

The EDGE Participation Statement of Intent to Contract and Perform from Section H. Additional Information must also

be submitted. Please identify the EDGE-certified Business Enterprises, by name, which will participate in the delivery of

the proposed professional services solicited in the RFQ.

H. Submittal Instructions

Firms are required to submit the current version of Statement of Qualifications (Form F110-330) available via the OFCC

website at Procurement Forms.

Electronic submittals should be combined into one PDF file saved with the form name, project number listed on the RFQ

and your firm’s name (ex. F110-330_OSU-nnnnnn_Firm Name). Use the “print” feature of Adobe Acrobat or similar

software for creating a PDF rather than using a scanner. If possible, please reduce the file size of the PDF. In Acrobat, go

to Advanced, then PDF Optimizer.

Statements of Qualifications must be submitted electronically by email. Submittals are limited to one email with a

maximum file size of 25 MB.

Firms are requested to identify professional registrations, memberships, and any other appropriate design and

construction industry credentials. Identify that information on the resume page for individual in Block 22, Section E of the

F110-330 form.

F130-08-2015-OCT

Publish Date: [leave blank]

Page 4 of 5

Commissioning Agent Selection Rating Form

State of Ohio Standard Forms and Documents

Project Name North Towers Renovations

Project Number OSU-250125

Proposer Firm

City, State, Zip

Selection Criteria

1. Primary Firm Location, Workload and Size (Maximum 10 points)

a. Proximity of firm to project site

b. Amount of fees awarded by Contracting Authority in

previous 24 months

c. Number of relevant professionals

Less than 50 miles

50 miles to 100 miles

More than 100 miles

Less than $200,000

$200,000 to $1,000,000

More than $1,000,000

Less than 2 professionals

2 to 8 professionals

More than 8 professionals

2. Primary Qualifications (Maximum 30 points)

a. Project management lead

b. Project administration lead

c. Technical staff

d. Construction administration staff

Experience / ability of project manager to

manage scope / budget / schedule / quality

Experience / ability to effectively administer

project controls and processes

Experience / ability of technical staff to verify

fully coordinated construction documents

Experience / ability of field representative to

identify and solve issues during construction

3. Key Consultant Qualifications (Maximum 20 points)

a. Key discipline leads

b. Proposed EDGE-certified Consultant participation*

Experience / ability of key consultants to

perform effectively and collaboratively

One additional point for every 2 percent

increase in professional services over the

advertised EDGE participation goal

4. Overall Team Qualifications (Maximum 10 points)

a. Previous team collaboration

b. Team organization

Less than 2 sample projects

2 to 4 sample projects

More than 4 sample projects

Clarity of responsibility / communication

demonstrated by table of organization

5. Overall Team Experience (Maximum 30 points)

a. Previous team performance

b. Experience with similar projects / delivery methods

c. Budget and schedule management

d. Knowledge of Ohio Capital Improvements process

Past performance as indicated by evaluations

and letters of reference

Less than 3 projects

3 to 6 projects

More than 6 projects

Performance in completing projects within

original construction budget and schedule

Less than 3 projects

3 to 6 projects

More than 6 projects

Value

Score

5

2

0

0

1

2

0

1.5

3

Max

=3

0 - 10

0 -5

0 - 10

0 -5

Max =

20

0 - 15

0-5

0

2

5

0-5

0 - 10

0-3

4-6

7 - 10

0-5

0-1

2-3

4-5

* Must be comprised of professional design services consulting firm(s) and NOT the primary firm

** Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design administered by the Green Building Certification Institute

Subtotal

Notes:

Evaluator:

Name

Signature

Date

F130-08-2015-OCT

Publish Date: 5/11/2026

Page 5 of 5

Commodity Codes

• NAICS 236210Industrial Building Construction
• NAICS 236220Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
• NAICS 237130Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction
• NAICS 238990All Other Specialty Trade Contractors

* Disclaimer: Government BidHub provides information on bids, RFPs (Requests for Proposals), and RFQs (Requests for Qualifications) solely for convenience and informational purposes. This site is not an official public notice board. For official details, responses, or inquiries, please contact the relevant government agency directly.