Taxicab Student Transportation Services - Questions and Answers
Project Information
- Bid Title
- Taxicab Student Transportation Services - Questions and Answers
- Issuing Agency
- Kirkwood School District
- Location
- Missouri
- Published Date
- Mar 26, 2026
- Closing Date
- Apr 3, 2026
- Government Level
- State & Local
- Status
- Closed
- Original Source
- Join to Access Full Details
- Bid Inquiries
- Join to Access Full Details
- Bid Documents
- Join to Access Full Details
- Project Description
-
The Kirkwood School District uses this site to post its requests for proposals (RFPs) and its requests for qualifications (RFQs). Both will also be advertised in various newspapers if so required by Board of Education Policy.
Project: Taxicab Student Transportation Services
Details: The Kirkwood School District is seeking vendors interested in providing taxicab student transportation services to students.
Due Date: 12:00 p.m. (noon) CDT on Friday, April 3, 2026
RFP for TAXICab Student Transportation ServicesQuestions and Answers for the TAXICab Student Transportation Services RFP
- Attachment Preview
-
Questions & Answers for RFP for McKinney-Vento Transportation ServicesSTUDENT Related Questions related to WAV, SSD, McKinney-Vento, General EdBased on current student numbers, approximately how many students will requiretransportation?A: The exact number is to be determined; however, it is anticipated to be fewer than 100students. During the 2024–2025 school year, approximately 48 students requiredtransportation services. Currently, the District has not identified any students requiringwheelchair-accessible vehicle (WAV) transportation under this program. There arecurrently 48-50 McKinney-Vento students, zero (0) Special education students, and 6general education students requiring individual transportation.If available, please also indicate the average number of students transported dailywithin each category.A: While approximate annual counts are provided above for context, the District does nottrack or report average daily transportation figures in this format for the purposes of thisRFP.Of those students, how many typically require specialized equipment duringtransport, such as booster seats, car seats, safety harnesses, or similaraccommodations?A: The need for specialized equipment varies depending on the individual studentsassigned for transportation. Vendors should be prepared to accommodate such needs on acase-by-case basis and demonstrate the ability to safely transport students requiring age-appropriate or situation-specific safety equipment.Q: How many counties does the District serve? Please list them.A: The District serves several counties within the region and surrounding areas.Transportation routes typically do not exceed a 30-mile radius.SUBMISSION of RFP Related QuestionsCan bids be dropped off directly instead of being mailed? If so, what is the name andaddress for delivery?A: Yes, bids may be delivered in person. Please submit them to the district’s finance officein care of Mr. Scott Cook at 1099 Milwaukee Street, Suite 260, Kirkwood, MO 63122.Are three hard copies and a digital copy (flash drive) required?A: The District requires three physical copies. A flash drive may be included as a backup;however, it will not be returned. Electronic submission is not accepted.Vendor Related QuestionsCan the District share current vendor names and rates?A: The District does not disclose current vendor information or contracted rates as part ofthe RFP process.How many vendors are currently used for this service?A: The District currently utilizes approximately three to four vendors.How would you rate current vendor performance (1–10)?A: Vendor performance varies. The District conducts annual surveys of staff and families toevaluate service quality and make informed, future decisions.What have current vendors done particularly well?A: Current vendors demonstrate strong performance in punctuality (approximately 99% on-time), clear and consistent communication, high-quality customer service, andaccountability.What areas need improvement?A: Opportunities for improvement vary by vendor and are addressed through ongoingperformance monitoring and feedback processes.Q: What is the anticipated annual contract value?A: The annual contract value is currently undefined and will depend on actual serviceneeds and awarded proposals.Q: Is this RFP intended to supplement or replace existing contracts?A: This RFP will replace current contracts set to expire.Q: What is the expected number of aides needed for the coming school year?A: No transportation aides are currently anticipated. No aides were utilized during thecurrent school year.Q: Can you share prior RFP documents (e.g., cost proposals or sample submissions)?A: The District does not release prior RFP submissions or related documentation.Q: What has been the average one-way trip mileage over the past 30 days?A: The average one-way trip distance is approximately 15 miles.Q: Where in the RFP are the Terms of the Agreement listed?A: The terms of agreement will be centered around the bids received.Q: Regarding communication expectations, would the notification capabilitieswithin Vendor’s parent app and staff portal be considered an acceptable method forcontacting both the District and parents?A: The District is open to the use of a parent-facing application or portal, but provided itensures appropriate data privacy and security protections for both families and the vendor.However, the use of a vendor-specific staff portal is not required. The District’s preferredmethods of communication remain direct channels such as phone and email to ensureclarity, accessibility, and ease of use. Vendors should be mindful of minimizing overlycomplex systems that require multiple user accounts or logins unless they offer a clearoperational benefit and simplicity for all users.Q: Should respondents simply acknowledge and agree to the terms, or providedetailed explanations?A: Respondents should acknowledge and agree to the terms outlined in the RFP. Additionalclarification or description may be included where appropriate to demonstrateunderstanding and capability.Q: Where should the Letter of Engagement be included in the bid response?A: A draft or sample Letter of Engagement may be included as part of the proposalsubmission, preferably as an appendix or at the end of the response. Final terms will bereviewed and finalized with the selected vendor(s).Q: Could the District share the approximate annual contract value or historical annualspend for taxicab student transportation services under the current or most recentcontract?A: The District does not disclose historical spending or contract values as part of the RFPprocess. Respondents are encouraged to submit competitive pricing based on the scope ofservices outlined in this RFP.Q: Could the District share the approximate number of transportation requests or tripsprovided during the previous school year under this contract?A: The District is not providing historical trip volume data at this time. Vendors should basetheir proposals on the general service descriptions and estimated student counts includedin this RFP.Q: Are transportation requests typically limited within District boundaries, or shouldvendors anticipate service throughout the broader metropolitan area?A: Transportation requests are primarily within the surrounding region, and vendors shouldbe prepared to provide service throughout the greater metropolitan area as needed. Mosttrips are expected to fall within an approximate 30-mile radius.Q: Does the District anticipate any long-distance transportation requests outside ofthe immediate area, such as trips to specialized programs in neighboring districts?A: See answer above. There are no known special programs.Q: The RFP references behavioral safety training such as CPI or MANDT. Would theDistrict accept equivalent behavioral safety and student de-escalation trainingprograms that meet the same objectives if CPI or MANDT certification is notspecifically held by drivers?A: Yes, the District will accept equivalent training programs, provided they covercomparable content in student behavior management, de-escalation techniques, andsafety protocols. Vendors should clearly outline the training provided and how it aligns withthese objectives. These programs will be subject to review by our Director of Safety &Security.Q: The RFP indicates the District may inspect vehicles and driver records. Could theDistrict clarify whether these inspections are conducted on a scheduled basis or asneeded?A: Inspections may be conducted on an as-needed basis, at the District’s discretion, toensure compliance with safety and contractual requirements.Q: Can the District share how these transportation services are currently beingprovided (e.g., contracted vendor, local taxi provider, or district-managed service)?Additionally, what challenges or service gaps is the District hoping to address throughthis RFP?A: The District currently utilizes multiple contracted vendors to provide transportationservices. Through this RFP, the District seeks to establish partnerships with reliable, high-quality vendors capable of delivering consistent service, to build long-term relationshipsand improve overall service stability and coverage.Q: Does the District anticipate awarding this contract to multiple vendors, and if so,how are transportation requests typically allocated among awarded vendors?A: Yes, the District anticipates awarding contracts to multiple vendors. Transportationrequests are generally assigned based on factors such as vendor availability, geographicproximity, capacity, cost, and overall performance.Q: If awarded, what timeframe does the District anticipate for onboarding andinitiating transportation services prior to the contract start in July 2026?A: The anticipated contract start date is July 1, 2026. Vendors should be prepared tocomplete onboarding requirements, including driver vetting, vehicle inspections, andcoordination with District staff, prior to this date, to ensure smooth transition anduninterrupted service delivery at the start of the contract term.Q: The RFP includes Form No. 1 – Cost for submitting pricing. In addition to completingthe required pricing form, would the District permit respondents to include anadditional pricing sheet to further explain their pricing structure (e.g., base trip feeplus mileage model)?A: Yes, respondents are encouraged to include supplemental pricing documentation if ithelps clarify their proposed rate structure, assumptions, or cost model. However, therequired pricing form must still be completed in full.Q: This requirement appears twice on page 10. Can you confirm whether this isintentional or if additional information was meant to be included? (Single-pageexecutive summary of vendor profile)A: Thank you for bringing this to our attention. This requirement is only needed once. Theduplicate reference on page 10 may be disregarded.
- Commodity Codes
-
- NAICS 484121General Freight Trucking, Long-Distance, Truckload
Empower Your Bidding Strategy
Unlock Government BidHub's unparalleled access to high-quality, tailored bid information.
- Access an extensive database of bids, including comprehensive local and state opportunities.
- Receive customized alerts for the bids that matter most to your business.
- Explore detailed specifications to ensure precise and competitive submissions.
- Gain a competitive edge with up-to-date information and exclusive opportunities.
See Also
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) ST...
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) STATE 0000000391SL,1: Transportation Management System (TMS) Maintenance and Support
State Government of Missouri
Bid Due: 7/07/2026
Solicitation Number Posted Date Return Date Description Buyer Name 8471-31 06-01-26 08-31-26 Property
Southwest Missouri State University
Bid Due: 8/31/2026