Addenda #1 - LUMBERTON LOOP: SCOTTISH PACKING STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT AND ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
Project Information
- Bid Title
- Addenda #1 - LUMBERTON LOOP: SCOTTISH PACKING STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT AND ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
- Issuing Agency
- Lumberton city
- Location
- North Carolina
- Published Date
- Feb 4, 2026
- Closing Date
- Feb 6, 2026
- Government Level
- State & Local
- Status
- Closed
- Ref. #
- RFQ#: COL-2026-SP-001
- Original Source
- Join to Access Full Details
- Bid Inquiries
- Join to Access Full Details
- Bid Documents
- Join to Access Full Details
- Project Description
-
Bid Number: RFQ#: COL-2026-SP-001
Bid Title: Addenda #1 - LUMBERTON LOOP: SCOTTISH PACKING STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT AND ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
Category: Public Works Status: Open Publication Date/Time: 2/2/2026 12:00 AM Closing Date/Time: Open Until Contracted Related Documents: - Attachment Preview
-
City of LumbertonRFQ#: COL-2026-SP-001Addenda #1Date of RFQ Issue: January 23, 2026Date of Addenda #1 Issue: February 2, 2026LUMBERTON LOOP: SCOTTISH PACKING STRUCTURALASSESSMENT AND ARCHITECTURAL SERVICESADDENDA #1The following questions were received prior to the close of the Questions period on January 30,2026 at 1:00pm EST.● Question #1: Will an Opinion of Probable Cost be appropriate and can you clarify whatis meant by the term "itemized"?● Answer: Yes, an Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC) is appropriate. Itemization of the OPCis desired to show, at minimum, estimated construction cost ranges for individualcomponents / facilities (e.g., bathrooms vs. shade structure vs. boardwalk, etc.) of theproposed design. A single line item / lump sum OPC without specificity does not fullycapture the goals of the project relating to future grant-writing and fundraising efforts.● Question #2: Is there an existing survey based on previous work done on the site?What information is represented on the survey?● Answer: Yes, surveys and engineering plans from previous work will be made availableto the selected consultant. In general, survey data represented in these maps includethe following:○ Parcel Boundaries○ Easements / Encroachments○ Existing Topography (1’ contours)○ Overhead Utilities○ Existing Tree Canopy○ Regulatory Flood Zones (floodway, 100-year floodplain, etc.)○ Impervious Surfaces (roads, concrete pads, etc.)○ Building Footprints○ Fencing○ Notes: (i) survey data for Impervious Surfaces, Building Footprints, and Fencingwas captured prior to the selective demolition of the buildings and structures onthe site, however, post-demolition aerial photography, field measurements, andCAD drawings have been gathered and generated by the City and CDDL (asillustrated in the RFQ Appendix) and will be made available to the selectedconsultant; and (ii) the selected consultant may be responsible for generatingPage 1City of LumbertonRFQ#: COL-2026-SP-001additional ‘as-is’ information (e.g., wall elevations) necessary to complete therequested Services in the RFQ.● Question #3: Is the design work from previous projects on the site, as noted in the RFQ,available for review / use as base files?● Answer: Yes, this information will be made available to the selected consultant.● Question #4: Is the rendering presented in the Lumberton Community Flood Print:Phase 2 document indicative of the level that is expected for the scope item "illustrativegraphic"?● Answer: Not necessarily. Illustrative graphic material to be produced under therequested Services can be negotiated between the City and selected consultant duringthe contracting phase.● Question #5: Some of the background information presented in the LumbertonCommunity Flood Print: Phase 2 appears to align with the programming mentioned inthe RFQ. Can we assume that these are the aspirational goals of the project?● Answer: Programmatic desires for the site have remained largely consistent with thegoals and objectives outlined in the “Lumberton Community Floodprint: Phase Two”document, however, the City understands that damages sustained to the remaining relicof the original structure may compromise the feasibility and/or practicality of all originalaspirations.● Question #6: Has any environmental testing been done on the site (and ESA Phase 1)?Will any documents be made available to the selected design team?● Answer: Yes, a Phase 1 ESA was previously completed and can be made available tothe selected consultant.Page 2
- Commodity Codes
-
- NAICS 541310Architectural Services
- NAICS 541330Engineering Services
* Disclaimer: Government BidHub provides information on bids, RFPs (Requests for Proposals), and RFQs (Requests for Qualifications) solely for convenience and informational purposes. This site is not an official public notice board. For official details, responses, or inquiries, please contact the relevant government agency directly.
Empower Your Bidding Strategy
Unlock Government BidHub's unparalleled access to high-quality, tailored bid information.
- Access an extensive database of bids, including comprehensive local and state opportunities.
- Receive customized alerts for the bids that matter most to your business.
- Explore detailed specifications to ensure precise and competitive submissions.
- Gain a competitive edge with up-to-date information and exclusive opportunities.
See Also
Request for Qualifications - ...
Request for Qualifications - Church Street Park Field Improvements Closing date July 09,
Town of Morrisville
Bid Due: 7/09/2026
RFQ #26-065 Architectural & E...
RFQ #26-065 Architectural & Engineering Services RFQ #26-065 Architectural & Engineering Services -
Wake County
Bid Due: 7/21/2026