Project Information

Bid Title

Creek on the Blue Mile Bridges

Issuing Agency

Statesboro city

Location

Georgia

Published Date

May 15, 2025

Closing Date

Jun 11, 2025

Government Level

State & Local

Status

Closed

Original Source

Join to Access Full Details

Bid Inquiries

Join to Access Full Details

Bid Documents

Join to Access Full Details

Project Description

Creek on the Blue Mile Bridges

COUNCIL

Tangie Johnson, District 1 Paulette Chavers, District 2 Ginny Hendley, District 3 John Riggs, District 4

Shari R Barr, District 5

3/27/2025

CITY OF STATESBORO

Jonathan McCollar, Mayor Charles Penny, City Manager Leah Harden, City Clerk

Cain Smith, City Attorney

50 EAST MAIN STREET • P.O. BOX 348 STATESBORO, GEORGIA 30459-0348

Request for Qualifications

To Provide

Engineering Design Services for

Creek on the Blue Mile Bridges
PI 0019357

SR 67; SR 73 & CS 699/Zetterower Avenue @ Little Lotts Creek

RFQ2025-31

Qualifications Due:  June 11, 2025

City of Statesboro
50 E Main Street

Statesboro, GA 30458-1159

1

RFQ2025-31

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS Engineering Design Services for PI 0019357

I.

General Project Information

D

E.

F.

G.

H.

Overview

The City of Statesboro (City) is soliciting Statement of Qualifications (SOQs) from qualified firm(s) or organization(s) to provide consultant services for bridge replacement on SR73/US25/US 301/South Main Street; SR67/Fair Road; and CS 699/South Zetterower Avenue.

This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) seeks to identify potential providers for the Scope of Services for the project/contract listed in Exhibit I.  Firms that respond to this RFQ and are determined by the City to be sufficiently qualified, may be deemed eligible, and invited to offer a technical approach and/or possibly present and/or interview for these services.  All respondents to this RFQ are subject to instructions communicated in this document and are cautioned to completely review the entire RFQ and follow instructions carefully. The City reserves the right to reject any or all Statements of Qualifications or Technical Approach, and to waive technicalities and informalities at the discretion of the City.

IMPORTANT- A RESTRICTION OF COMMUNICATION IS IN EFFECT FOR THIS PROJECT.

From the advertisement date of this solicitation until successful respondents are selected and the award is made official and announced, firms are not allowed to communicate about this solicitation or scope with any staff of the City including the Mayor and City Council, except for the submission of questions as instructed in the RFQ, or with the contact designated in RFQ Section VIII.C., or as provided by any existing work agreement(s).  For violation of this provision, the City reserves the right to reject the submittal of the offending respondent.

Due to the federal funding, this project will utilize the Georgia Department of Transportation Board adopted16% overall annual goal for Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) participation on all federally fundedprojects. This goal is not to be considered as a fixed quota, set aside or preference. The DBE goal can bemet by prime contracting, sub-contracting, joint-venture or mentor/ protégé relationship.

The City will monitor and assess each consultant services submittals for their DBE participation and/or good faith effort in promoting equity and opportunity in accordance with the state of Georgia, Department of Transportation Disadvantage Business Program Plan.

For more information on the GDOT DBE Program please contact:

Georgia Department of Transportation Equal Opportunity Division

One Georgia Center, 7 ^th Floor

600 West Peachtree Street, NW Atlanta, Georgia 30308

Phone: (404) 631-1972

Scope of Services

Under the terms of the resulting Agreement, the selected consultant will provide engineering design services, for the Project identified. The anticipated scope of work for the project/contract is included in Exhibit I.

In addition, the City desires that the Consultant have the ability to provide, either with its own forces or through a sub-consultant team member, comprehensive services necessary to fulfill all preliminary engineering services which may arise during the project cycle.

Contract Term and Type

The City anticipates one (1) Multi-Phase, Project Specific contract  to  be  awarded  to  one  (1)  firm,  for  the project/contract identified. The City anticipates that the Contract Type may be Lump Sum, Cost Plus Fixed Fee, Cost per Unit of Work or Specific Rate of Compensation. As a Project Specific contract, it is the City’s intention that

2

RFQ2025-31

the Agreements will remain in effect until successful completion of the preliminary engineering phase of the project and may choose to utilize the selected consultant for use on construction revisions as necessary.

I.

Contract Amount

The Multi-Phase, Project Specific contract amount will be determined via negotiations with the City. If the City is unable to reach a satisfactory agreement and at reasonable rates to be paid for the services to be provided, the City reserves the right to terminate negotiations with the highest scoring finalist and begin negotiations with the next highest scoring finalist.

II.

Selection Method

A.

B.

C.

D.

E.

Method of Communication

All general communication  of  relevant  information  regarding  this  solicitation  will  be  made  via  the  Georgia Procurement Registry (GPR) under RFQ2025-31. All firms are responsible for checking the GPR on a regular basis for updates, clarifications, and announcements. the City reserves the right to communicate via electronic mail with the primary contact listed in the Statements of Qualifications. Other specific communications will be made as indicated in the remainder of this RFQ.

Phase I – Selection of Finalists

Based on the Statements of Qualifications submitted in response to the projects/contracts listed in this RFQ, the Selection Committee will review the Experience and Qualifications and Resources and Workload Capacity listed in Section IV. Selection Criteria for Phase I. The Selection Committee will discuss the top submittals, and the final rankings of the top submittals will be determined. From the final rankings of the top submittals, the Selection Committee will identify three (3) to five (5) firms which will be shortlisted.

All firms must meet the minimum requirements as listed in Section IV.A. below.

Finalist Notification for Phase II

Firms selected and shortlisted as finalists will receive notification and final instructions from the City regarding the Phase II – Technical Approach response.

Phase II – Finalists Response on Technical Approach and Past Performance

The City will request a Technical Approach of the three (3) to five (5) finalist firms for the project/contract. The City reserves the right to request a presentation/interview on any project/contract as determined in its best interests; however, this additional requirement shall typically be reserved for the most complex projects. Each finalist firm shall be notified in writing and informed of the Technical Approach due date.  Any additional detailed Technical Approach instructions and requirements, beyond that provided in Section V. Selection Criteria for Phase II, for the finalists will be provided in the Finalist Notification. All members of the Selection Committee will review the Technical Approach (and will attend the presentation/interview if so chosen). Firms shall not address anyquestions, prior to the award announcement, to anyone other than the designated contact.

Final Selection

Final selection will be determined by carrying the scores from Phase I forward for each Finalist and by evaluating the Technical Approach and Past Performance criteria for Phase II.  The Selection Committee will discuss the Finalist’s Phase II Responses, and the final rankings will be determined.

Negotiations will then be initiated with the top-ranked firm(s) to finalize the terms and conditions of the contract(s), including the fees to be paid.  In the event a satisfactory agreement cannot be reached with the highest-ranking firm(s), the City will formally terminate the negotiations and possibly enter into negotiations with the second highest- ranking firm, and so on in turn until a mutual agreement is established and the City awards a contract. The final form of the contract shall be developed by the City.

3

RFQ2025-31

III.

Schedule of Events

The following Schedule of Events represents the City’s best estimate of the Schedule that will be followed.  All times indicated are prevailing times in Statesboro, Georgia.  The City reserves the right to adjust the Schedule as the City deems necessary.

PHASE I	DATE	TIME
a. Issuance of public advertisement of RFQ2025-31	5/15/2025	———-
b. Deadline for submission of written questions and requests for clarification	5/29/2025	3:00 PM
c. Deadline for submission of Statements of Qualifications	6/18/2025	3:00 PM
d. Mandatory Pre-bid	6/4/2025	3:00 PM
d. The City completes evaluation and issues notification and other information to finalist firms	TBD
PHASE II
e. Deadline for submission of written questions from finalists	TBD	3:00 PM
f.  Phase II Response of Finalist firms due	TBD	3:00 PM

Selection Criteria for Phase I – Criteria for Evaluation of Statements of Qualifications

A.

B.

Area Class Requirements and Certification

Presented teams must be prequalified in the indicated Area Class(es) in order to be evaluated.  Required proof of prequalification shall be submitted as indicated in Section VI.B.4. below.  All Submittals will be pre-screened to verify that the Prime consultant has the required Area Class(es) and that the overall team has the required Area Class(es). Any submittal in which the Prime consultant or the overall team area class requirements are not met will be disqualified from further consideration.

Each submittal will require a certification to allow the City to analyze risks in determining if any firm should be ineligible for award.  The certification shall cover a wide variety of information.  Any firm which responds in any potentially concerning manner must provide additional information as directed herein for consideration by the City to determine if Firm is eligible for award.

Project Manager, Key Team Leader(s) and Prime’s Experience and Qualifications – 30%

The Selection Committee will evaluate all firms on their Experience and Qualifications, which shall account for a total of thirty (30%) percent of the total evaluation.  The following criteria for scoring Phase I of the evaluationwill be utilized to determine which firms are shortlisted:

1.

2.

3.

Project  Manager  education,  registration,  relevant  engineering  experience,  relevant  project  management experience, experience in utilizing the City specific processes, manuals, or guidance.

Key Team Leaders’ education, registration, relevant technical experience, and relevant experience in utilizing the City specific processes, manuals, or guidance.

Prime Consultant’s experience in delivering projects of similar complexity, size, scope, and function.

4

RFQ2025-31

C.

Project Manager, Key Team Leader(s) and Prime’s Resources and Workload Capacity – 20%

The Selection Committee will evaluate all firms on their Resources availability and Workload Capacity which shall account for a total of twenty (20%) percent of the total evaluation. The following criteria for scoring theResources and Workload Capacity will be utilized to determine which firms are shortlisted:

1.

2.

3.

4.

Project Manager Workload

Workload capacity of Key Team Leader(s) Resources dedicated to delivering project Ability to Meet Project Schedule

V.

Selection Criteria for Phase II – Criteria for Evaluation of Technical Approach and Past Performance

A.

Technical Approach – 40%

The Selection Committee will evaluate the shortlisted firms (Finalists) on their Technical Approach, which shall account for a total of forty (40%) percent.  The Selection Committee shall utilize the following additional criteria for scoring Phase II of the evaluation to determine the highest ranked/most qualified (NOTE: Scores from Phase Iwill be carried forward and combined with the scores from the Phase II to determine the final ranking ofFinalists):

1.

2.

3.

Provide any unique technical approaches your firm offers relative to addressing anticipated design concepts, use of any alternative methods for delivery (if applicable), and/or management of the project.

Identify any unique challenges of the project and how your firm intends to mitigate these challenges, including quality control, quality assurance procedures.

Provide any specific qualifications, skills, knowledge of the project and project area which may uniquely benefit the firm and project, and your ability and willingness to meet time requirements.

B.

Past Performance – 10%

The  Selection  Committee  may  consider  information  provided  via  references  provided  for  relevant  projects, knowledge any selection committee member has of performance on relevant projects, and performance evaluations or knowledge presented on GDOT projects.  The Selection Committee will consider all factors in their totality and score from 0 to 10 when arriving at a final score for the Past Performance.

VI.

Instructions for Content and Preparation of Statements of Qualifications – Phase I Response

Statements of Qualifications must be submitted in strict accordance with the instructions provided in SectionVIII. Submittals MUST be organized, and categorized as outlined, adhering to the headings, numbering andlettering as specified.  Where page limits are stated, each section must begin on a new page and end on thelast page allowed for the section.           Do not begin new sections on a page allowed for a previous section.Adherence to these guidelines will enable the City to ensure compliance with the page limitations.

Cover page –

Each project/contract submittal must have a separate cover page for each copy of each submittal for each project/contract and each must list the RFQ#, RFQ Title, proposing firm’s full legal name and the specific project contract being submitted on to include the PI Numbers, County(ies), and Description.

A.

Administrative Requirements

It is required to submit the information below for each copy of each submittal. This is general informationand will not be scored but may be used to determine eligibility for selection. Under AdministrativeRequirements section, only submit the information requested; additional information will be subject todisqualification of your firm.

1. Basic company information:

5

RFQ2025-31

a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

f.

g.

Company name.

Company Headquarter Address.

Contact Information – Name and all contact information (telephone number(s) and e-mail address) of primary proposing contact (this will be the individual with whom the City will direct all communications). Company website (if available).

Georgia Addresses – Identify and provide addresses for the offices located in the State of Georgia.

Staff – List the number and disciplines of staff members employed in each office in the State of Georgia. Ownership – Provide form of ownership, including state of residency or incorporation, and number of years in business. Is the Offeror a sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, limited liability Corporation, or other structure?

2.

3.

4.

Certification Form – Complete the Certification Form (Exhibit “II” enclosed with RFQ) and provide a notarized original within the firm’s Statement of Qualifications. This is to be submitted for the Prime ONLY.

Georgia Security and Immigration Compliance Act Affidavit – Complete the form (Exhibit “III” enclosed with RFQ)and provide a notarized original within the firm’s Statement of Qualifications.  This is to be submitted for the Prime ONLY.

Addenda – Signed cover page of any Addenda issued for the Prime ONLY.

B.

Experience and Qualifications

1.

Project Manager – Provide information pertaining to the project manager, including but not limited to:

a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

Education.

Registration (if necessary and applicable.)

Relevant engineering experience.

Relevant project management experience for projects of similar complexity, size, scope, and function.

Relevant experience utilizing all applicable processes, manuals, or guidance, including but not limited

to GDOT’s Plan Development Process, Design Policy Manual, Environmental Procedures Manual, Utility Accommodation Policy and Standards Manual, etc.

2.

This information is limited to two (2) pages maximum.

Key Team Leaders – Provide experience of Key Team Leaders (defined as those individuals who oversee project areas determined as particularly important to each specific project, refer to the Project Description in Exhibit I, specifically Section 7 for the list of Key Team Leaders for each Project). For each Key Team Leader identified provide:

a.

b.

c.

d.

Education.

Registration (if necessary and applicable.)

Relevant experience in the applicable resource area of the most relevant projects.

Relevant experience utilizing all applicable processes, manuals, or guidance, including but not limited to GDOT’s Plan Development Process, Design Policy Manual, Environmental Procedures Manual, Utility Accommodation Policy and Standards Manual, etc. which are specific to the key team leader’s area.

3.

This information is limited to one (1) page maximum for each Key Team Leader identified in Section 7of each Exhibit I. Respondents submitting more than one (1) page for each Key Team Leader identifiedwill be subject to disqualification.  Respondents who provide more Key Team Leaders than what isoutlined in the requirement will be subject to disqualification as this would provide an advantage overfirms  who  complied  with  the  requirement  and  had  the  required  number  of  Key  Team  Leaders.Respondents who do not provide the required Key Team Leaders will be subject to disqualification asthis does not meet the requirements of the project and therefore would deem the respondent and itsteam unqualified for the award.

Prime Experience – Provide information on the prime’s experience and ability in delivering effective services for projects of similar complexity, size, scope, and function, which demonstrate the firm’s capabilities to provide services for the City. For each project, the following information should be provided:

a.

b.

c.

Client name, project location and dates during which services were performed. Description of overall project and services performed by your firm.

Duration of project services provided by your firm, and overall project budget.

6

RFQ2025-31

d.

e.

Experience utilizing GDOT specific processes, manuals, or guidance (PDP, Design Policy, Environmental Procedures Manual, etc.)

Client(s) current contact information including contact names, telephone numbers and email address. Involvement of Key Team Leaders on the projects.

4.

This information is limited to two (2) pages maximum.

Area Class Summary Form and Notice of Professional Consultant Qualifications – Prime Consultants are defined as the firm submitting the Statement of Qualifications and the firm with whom the City will contract. The Team is defined as the Prime Consultant and their sub-consultants, who are considered team members. Prime Consultants and their sub-consultant team members must meet the GDOT Area Class requirements listed in Exhibit I for each project on which they apply. In regard to the required Area Classes, for each project/contract on which they apply, respondents should submit a summary form (example provided in Exhibit IV) which details the required area classes for the Prime Consultant and all sub-consultants or joint-venture of consultants on the team listed in the Statement of Qualifications.  The area classes and firm’s meeting the area classes listed on the summary form must meet all required area classes or the team will be disqualified.  If a team member’s prequalification will expire prior to the due date of the SOQs, documentation must be provided which shows that the firm has submitted its application for prequalification prior to the SOQ due date. The team must maintain its prequalification certification to be considered eligible for award if selected. Additionally, respondentsshould submit the Notice of Professional Consultant Qualifications (for the Prime Consultant and allsub-consultants for each project) issued by GDOT and attach after the Area Class summary form.

This information is limited to the one (1) page for the Area Class table (unless the project needs requirean extensive list of area classes) and the required Notice of Professional Consultant Qualifications.

C.

Resources/Workload Capacity

1.

Overall Resources – Provide information regarding the overall resources dedicated to delivering the specific project, including:

a.

b.

c.

Organizational chart which identifies the project manager, prime, Key Team Leaders, support personnel, and reporting structure.  This chart may be submitted on a 11” x 17” page. (Excluded from the pagecount)

Primary Office – Identify and discuss the primary office which will be responsible for handling the specific project and the number and types of staff within the office and how this office could benefit the project and promote efficiency. This information to be included on the one (1) page with the Narrative onAdditional Resource Areas and Ability.

Narrative on Additional Resource Areas and Ability – Respondents are to provide information regarding additional resource areas identified as important to the project, to discuss how the key areas will integrate and work together on the project, to discuss any information which is pertinent to these areas, to provide a narrative regarding how the organization of the team, including the PM and Key Team Leaders can deliver the project on schedule given their workload capacity. (The City recognizes that some individuals may be able to meet the schedule while carrying heavier project loads.) Respondents may discuss the advantages of your team and the abilities of the team members which will enable the project to meet the proposed schedule as identified in Exhibit I (where applicable). If there is no proposed schedule, discuss the advantages of the team and the abilities of the team members which will enable the project to move as expeditiously as possible.  Respondents submitting more than the one (1) page allowed (combinedfor C1.b. and C1.c.), will be subject to disqualification.

2.

Project Manager Commitment Table – Provide a list of ALL projects (the City, other governments and private contracts – Information may be validated and any firm determined not to be listing all projects may be subject to disqualification) on which the proposed project manager is currently committed, to enable the City to ascertain the project manager’s availability.  Utilize a table similar to the following format with a minimum of all criteria indicated to provide the requested information:

7

RFQ2025-31

Project Manager	PI/Project # for GDOT Projects/Name of Customer for Non-GDOT Projects	Role of PM on Project	Project Description	Current  Phase of Project	Current  Status  of Project	Monthly   Time Commitment in Hours

3.

Key Team Leader Project Commitment Table – Provide a table similar to the below, with a minimum of all criteria indicated, which identifies ALL projects the Key Team Leaders (refer to the Project Description in Exhibit I, specifically Section 7 for the list of Key Team Leaders for each Project) are committed on to enable the City to ascertain the available capacity.

Key Team Leader	PI/Project # for GDOT Projects/Name of Customer for Non-GDOT Projects	Role of Key Team Leader on Project	Project Description	Current Phase of Project	Current Status of Project	Monthly Time Commitment in Hours

This information is limited to the organization chart (excluded from page count), [one (1) page of text toinclude both C1.b. Primary Office and C1.c. Narrative on Additional Resource Areas and Ability], and thetables.

VII. Instructions for Preparing Technical Approach and Past Performance Response – Phase II Response

The following information will only be requested of the shortlisted firms. The Selection Committee will evaluatethe shortlisted firms using the information provided as requested below (NOTE: Scores from Phase I will becarried forward to Phase II):

The Phase II responses must be submitted in strict accordance with the instructions provided in Section IX.Submittals MUST be organized, and categorized as outlined, adhering to the headings, numbering and letteringas specified.  Where page limits are stated, each section must begin on a new page and end on the last pageallowed for the section.  Do not begin new sections on a page allowed for a previous section. Adherence tothese guidelines will enable the City to ensure compliance with the page limitations.

Phase II Cover page – Each submittal must have a separate cover page for each copy of each Phase II submittal, and each must indicate the response is for Phase II, list the RFQ#, RFQ Title, proposing firm’s full legal name and the specific project contract being submitted on to include the PI Numbers and Description.

A.

Technical Approach

1.

2.

3.

Provide any unique technical approaches your firm offers relative to addressing anticipated design concepts, use of any alternative methods for delivery (if applicable), and/or management of the project.

Identify any unique challenges of the project and how your firm intends to mitigate these challenges, including quality control, quality assurance procedures.

Provide any specific qualifications, skills, knowledge of the project and project area which may uniquely benefit the firm and project, and your ability and willingness to meet time requirements.

B.

This information will be limited to a maximum of three (3) pages.

Past Performance

No additional information should be submitted to fulfill this requirement.  Information from the relevantprojects listed as well as information on file with the City will be used to fulfill this requirement.

8

RFQ2025-31

Past performance may be evaluated through the checking of project references for the proposed project manager as well as the firm.  The City will check these references at random.  For this reason, attention should be paid to

the references provided to ensure that the contact information provided is accurate and the individual references are reachable. Other past performance information which may be utilized includes The City consultant performance ratings as well as knowledge that any member of the Selection Committee has pertaining to the past performance of the firm on any project.

VIII. Instructions for Submittal for Phase I – Statements of Qualifications

A.

B.

C.

There is one (1) electronic version submittal required.  The Submittal must follow the format and meet the content requirements identified in Section VI, entitled Instructions for Content and Preparation of Statements ofQualifications – Phase I Response. See Attachment 1 for a summary of how the submittals should be prepared.

Submittals must be typed on standard (8½” x 11”) paper.  The pages should be numbered; however, submittal pages will be counted by section to determine compliance with page limits.  Responses are limited to the page counts indicated in each section using a minimum of size 11 font.  Page counts will be determined by pages with print on them, not by the physical piece of paper.  Each Statement of Qualifications shall be prepared simply and economically as indicated above. Colored displays, and promotional materials are not desired. Emphasis must be on completeness, relevance, and clarity of content.

NOTE: Additional pages other than what has been specified above in each section should not be includedand will be grounds for disqualification.           Submittals are limited to the information requested in Section VI. Instructions for Content and Preparation of Statements of Qualifications – Phase I Response only. Hyperlinks or embedded video are not allowed.

Statements of Qualifications submittals must be a PDF document for each project/contract.  Each PDF document must follow the naming convention for electronic records as follows: the proposing firm’s full legal name, RFQ#, RFQ Title and the specific project contract number being submitted on.  To submit your Statement of Qualification

to Marcos Trejo, (912) 764-0681marcos.trejo@statesboroga.gov .

Statements of Qualifications must be received by the City prior to the deadline indicated in the Schedule of Events (Section III of RFQ).

No submittals will be accepted after the time and date set for receipt.

All expenses for preparing and submitting responses are the sole cost of the party submitting the response.  The City is not obligated to any party to reimburse such expenses.  All submittals upon receipt become the property of the City. Labeling information provided in submittals “proprietary” or “confidential”, or any other designation of restricted use will not protect the information from public view.  Subject to the provisions of the Open Records Act, the details of the proposal documents will remain confidential until final award.

the City reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to waive any technicalities associated with this submittal if deemed in the best interest of the City.

Questions and Requests for Clarification

Questions about any aspect of the RFQ, or the project, shall be submitted in writing via e-mail to:

Marcos Trejo, (912) 764-0681 email: marcos.trejo@statesboroga.gov .

The deadlines for submission of questions relating to the RFQ are the times and dates shown in the (Schedule ofEvents- Section III).  From the issue date of this solicitation until a successful proposer is selected and the award is made official and announced, respondents are subject to the Restriction of Communication in Section I.B.

IX.

Instructions for Submittal for Phase II – Technical Approach and Past Performance Response

THESE  INSTRUCTIONS  ARE  INTENDED  SOLELY  FOR  THOSE  FIRMS  IDENTIFIED  AND  NOTIFIED  ASFINALISTS. Final Instructions will be provided to the Finalists in the notification.

Please note that each project/contract will follow an individual schedule which meets the availability of eachSelection Committee.  For this reason, the Notice to Selected Finalists and resulting Phase II responses maybe on different schedules for each project/contract.

9

RFQ2025-31

A.

B.

There is one (1) electronic version submittal required.  The Submittal must follow the format and meet the content requirements identified in Section VII, entitled Instructions for Preparing Technical Approach and PastPerformance Response – Phase II Response.  See Attachment 1 for a summary of how the submittals should be prepared.

Submittals must be typed on standard (8½” x 11”) paper.  The pages should be numbered; however, submittal pages will be counted by section to determine compliance with page limits. Responses are limited to the page counts indicated in each section using a minimum of size 11 font.  Page counts will be determined by pages with print on them, not by the physical piece of paper.  Each Statement of Qualifications shall be prepared simply and economically as indicated above. Colored displays, and promotional materials are not desired. Emphasis must be on completeness, relevance, and clarity of content.

NOTE:  Additional pages other than what has been specified above in each section should not be included and willbe grounds for disqualification.  Submittals are limited to the information requested in Section VII.  Instructions for Preparing Technical Approach and Past Performance Response-Phase II Response only. Hyperlinks or embedded video are not allowed.

Technical Approach submittal must be a PDF document for each project/contract. Each PDF document must follow the naming convention for electronic records as follows: the proposing firm’s full legal name, RFQ#, RFQ Title and the specific project contract being submitted on.  To submit your Technical Approach to Marcos Trejo, (912) 764- 0681, email: marcos.trejo@statesboroga.gov .

Technical Approach must be received by the City prior to the deadline indicated in Notice to Selected Finalists.

C.

D.

No submittals will be accepted after the time and date set for receipt.

All expenses for preparing and submitting responses are the sole cost of the party submitting the response.  The City is not obligated to any party to reimburse such expenses.  All submittals upon receipt become the property of the City.  Labeling information provided in submittals “proprietary” or “confidential”, or any other designation of restricted use will not protect the information from public view.  Subject to the provisions of the Open Records Act, the details of the proposal documents will remain confidential until final award.

The City reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to waive any technicalities associated with this submittal if deemed in the best interest of the City.

No submittals will be accepted after the time and date set for receipt.

Responses submitted via facsimile or e-mail will be rejected. All expenses for preparing and submitting responses are the sole cost of the party submitting the response.  The City is not obligated to any party to reimburse such expenses. All submittals upon receipt become the property of the City. Labeling information provided in submittals “proprietary” or “confidential”, or any other designation of restricted use will not protect the information from public view.    Subject to the provisions of the Open Records Act, the details of the proposal documents will remain confidential until final award.

The City reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to waive any technicalities associated with this submittal if deemed in the best interest of the City.

Questions and Requests for Clarification

Questions about any aspect of the Phase II Response for Finalists, shall be submitted in writing via e-mail to: Marcos Trejo e-mail: marcos.trejo@statesboroga.gov .

or as directed in the Notice to Selected Finalists, if different.  The deadlines for submission of questions relating to the Phase II Response will be identified in the Notice to Selected Finalists.  From the issue date of this solicitation until a successful proposer is selected and the award is made official and announced, respondents are subject to the Restriction of Communication in Section I.B.

10

RFQ2025-31

X.

Terms and Conditions

A.

B.

Statement of Agreement

With the submission of a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ), the respondent agrees that he/she has carefully examined the Request for Qualifications and agrees that it is the respondent’s responsibility to request clarification on any issues in any section of the Request for Qualifications with which the respondent disagrees or needs clarified. The respondent also understands that failure to mention these items during the question period or in the SOQ will be interpreted to mean that the respondent is in full agreement with the terms, conditions, specifications and requirements in the therein.  With submission of a SOQ, the respondent hereby certifies:  (a) that this SOQ is genuine and is not made in the interest or on behalf of any undisclosed person, firm, or corporation; (b) that respondent has not directly or indirectly included or solicited any other respondent to put in a false or insincere SOQ; (c) that respondent has not solicited or induced any person, firm, or corporation to refrain from sending a SOQ.

The respondent also understands that failure to provide required information may result in disqualification. Failure

to provide administrative information may not result in disqualification. At the City’s discretion, the City may notify the respondent that administrative information is not provided or there was an error in the information provided, and the City will allow a respondent to provide an update to the administrative information.  However, the exception to this is the provision of the required GEORGIA SECURITY AND IMMIGRATION COMPLIANCE ACT AFFIDAVIT, which by Georgia Law requires disqualification of the response.  The above changes mentioned to administrative information would be considered allowable as these would be limited to changes which do not affect the information which the evaluators use to score the respondents. Failure of a respondent to provide the specific administrative information as required in the notice will result in disqualification. Any respondent who provides changes in addition to the information requested in the notice shall be subject to disqualification.  Failure of a respondent’s SOQ to provide any information pertaining to a respondent and its teams qualifications, of any type, will subject the SOQ to disqualification. The City will not allow updates to qualifications to be provided to avoid disqualification as this would allow a respondent to modify its SOQ and alter the information which evaluators would score. The above changes related to qualifications would not be allowable as these would allow changes which do affect the information which the evaluators use to score the respondents SOQ.

Joint-Venture Proposals, Sub-Consultants, and Vendors

The City does not generally desire to enter into “joint-venture” agreements with multiple firms.  In the event two or more firms desire to “joint venture”, it is strongly recommended that one incorporated firm propose and maintain status as the Program Management firm with the remaining firms participating as major firms.  Any joint venture, proposed and established as a separate business entity, should have its own set of books and supporting documentation sufficient for an audit trail. Transactions should be recorded consistent with the joint-venture agreement, and care must be taken to ensure that the joint-venture bears its equitable share of the costs. Therefore, “unpopulated joint-ventures” would not have an adequate accounting system suitable for cost reimbursement contracts.

However more traditional “populated joint-ventures” are welcomed.  A populated joint-venture is where an alliance

is brought to life by infusing it with working capital, employees, and control systems.  The alliance implements all necessary business systems, including payroll processing, purchasing, property control, etc.   The alliance will develop its own indirect rate structure and calculates its own indirect cost rates, based on the direct and indirect costs it incurs.

Sub-Consultants shall generally be considered any team member which is performing any service which typically requires prequalification, which is subject to the Audit and Accounting System Requirements, and whose services are billed as costs.  Sub-Consultant Team Members must be written into the resulting Agreement and are subject

to all terms and conditions in the Agreement.  Vendors shall be considered any team member which is performing any service which typically does not require prequalification, which is not subject to the Audit and Accounting System Requirements, and whose services are billed as direct expenses.  Vendors may not be written into the resulting Agreement and may not be subject to all terms and conditions in the Agreement.

11

RFQ2025-31

C.

D.

Non-Discrimination and Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Requirements

The City in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 78 Stat. 252, 42 USC 2000d–42 and Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, part 21, Nondiscrimination in federally assisted programs of the Department of Transportation issued pursuant to such Act, hereby notifies all proposers that it will affirmatively ensure that any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, minority business enterprises will be afforded full opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin in consideration for an award.

Due to the federal funding, this project will utilize the Georgia Department of Transportation Board adopted16% overall annual goal for Disadvantaged Business enterprise (DBE) participation on all federally fundedprojects. This goal is not to be considered as a fixed quota, set aside or preference. The DBE goal can bemet by prime contracting, sub-contracting, joint-venture or mentor/ protégé relationship.

The City will monitor and assess each consultant services submittals for their DBE participation and/or good faith effort in promoting equity and opportunity in accordance with the state of Georgia, Department of Transportation Disadvantage Business Program Plan.

For more information on the GDOT DBE Program please contact:

Georgia Department of Transportation Equal Opportunity Division

One Georgia Center, 7 ^th Floor

600 West Peachtree Street, NW Atlanta, Georgia 30308

Phone: (404) 631-1972

Audit and Accounting System Requirements

The City reserves the right to reject any proposal with firms that do not meet the following requirements:

1.

2.

3.

4.

Firm(s) should have an accounting system in place to meet requirements of 48 CFR Part 31 and, in the case of non-profit organizations, OMB Circular A-122.

Any firm that currently has an aggregate contract amount exceeding $250,000 should have submitted their yearly CPA overhead audit.

Firm(s) should have no significant outstanding deficient audit findings from previous contracts with the City that have not been resolved.

The prime is responsible for being reasonably assured that all sub-consultant(s) presented as a part of the proposed team are similarly in compliance with the above requirements.

E.

F.

Submittal Costs and Confidentiality

All expenses for preparing and submitting responses are the sole cost of the respondent submitting the response. The City is not obligated to any respondent to reimburse such expenses.  All submittals upon receipt become the property of the City.  Labeling information provided in submittals as “proprietary” or “confidential”, or any other designation of restricted use will not protect the information from public view. Subject to the provisions of the Open Records Act, the details of the proposal documents will remain confidential until a final award.

Award Conditions

This request is not an offer to contract or a solicitation of bids. This request and any proposal submitted in response, regardless of whether the proposal is determined to be the best proposal, is not binding upon the City and does not obligate the City to procure or contract for any services. Neither the City nor any respondent submitting a response will be bound unless and until a written contract mutually accepted by both parties is negotiated as to its terms and conditions and is signed by the City and a respondent containing such terms and conditions as are negotiated between those parties. The City reserves the right to waive non-compliance with any requirements of this Request for Qualifications and to reject any or all proposals submitted in responses. Upon review of responses, the City will determine the respondent(s) proposal that in the sole judgment of the City is in the best interest of the City (if any

12

RFQ2025-31

is so determined), with respect to the evaluation criteria stated herein. The City then intends to conduct negotiations with such respondent(s) to determine if an acceptable contract may be reached.

G.

H.

I.

J.

Debriefings

In lieu of Pre-Award and Post-Award debriefings, it shall be the City’s policy to provide the “Selection Package” at the time of the Selection Announcement (also referred to as the Announcement of Entering into Negotiations). The “Selection Package” will include the scores and comments of phases for all firms who responded and will typically be provided as a PDF file and e-mailed. Previously, pre-award debriefings only provided the scores and comments of the firm. It shall be the policy of the City that all debriefings will typically be conducted in writing.

Right to Cancel or Change RFQ

The City reserves the right to cancel any and all Request for Qualifications where it is determined to be in the best interest of the City to do so. The City reserves the right to increase, reduce, add or delete any item in this solicitation as deemed necessary.

It is the responsibility of all firms interested in submitting Statement of Qualifications (SOQs) for this advertisement to routinely check the posting on the Georgia Procurement Registry for any revisions to this RFQ.

Substitutions, Alternates, Exceptions, and Extensions

No substitutions or alternates will be accepted for this solicitation.  Any respondent submitting substitutions or alternates will be considered non-responsive and will not be considered for award.

Code of Conduct Pertaining to Conflict of Interest in the Award and Administration of Contracts

Contractor warrants and represents that:

The Services to be performed hereunder will not create an actual or apparent conflict of interest with any other work it is currently performing; and the firm is not presently subject to any agreement with a competitor or with any other party that will prevent the firm from performing in full accord with this Agreement; and the firm is not subject to any statute, regulation, ordinance, or rule that will limit its ability to perform its obligations under this Agreement; and

the firm shall be free to accept other work during the term hereof; provided, however, that such other work shall not interfere with the provision of Services hereunder.

EXHIBIT I

Project/Contract

1.

2.

3.

PI Number: 0019357

Description: Located in city of Statesboro, the project begins at SR 73/US25/US 301/South Main Street and concludes at CS 699/South Zetterower Avenue. The project intends to replace existing bridge on SR 73/US/25/US 301/South Main Street at Little Lotts Creek in place with a grade separated bridge, replace bridge on SR 67/Fair Road at Little Lotts Creek at new location with a grade separated bridge, widen an existing culvert on CS 699/South Zetterower Avenue at Little Lotts Creek. The project is approximately 0.60 mile. Tasks for construction engineering and

inspection may be included in the contract.

Required Area Classes:

Prime Consultants are defined as the firm submitting the Statement of Qualifications and the firm with whom the City will contract.         The Team is defined as the Prime Consultant and their sub-consultants, who are considered team members.  The Prime Consultant must be prequalified in the Area Classes identified below in Section 5.A. The Prime Consultant or sub-consultant team members must be prequalified in the Area Classes identified below in Section 5.B. Respondents should submit a summary form (example provided in Exhibit IV) which details the required area classes for the Prime Consultant and all sub-consultants or joint venture of consultants on the team listed in the Statement of Qualifications.  The area classes listed on the summary form must meet all required area classes or the team will be disqualified. The Prequalification Expiration Date must be current by the deadline stated for this RFQ.

13

RFQ2025-31

1. The Prime Consultant MUST be prequalified by GDOT in the area classes listed below:

Number	Area Class
4.01(a)	Minor Bridge Design

1. The Team (either the Prime Consultant and/or one or more of their sub-consultant team members) MUST be

prequalified by GDOT in the area classes listed below:

Number	Area Class
1.06(a)	NEPA
1.06(b)	History
1.06(c)	Air Quality
1.06(d)	Noise
1.06(e)	Ecology
1.06(f)	Archaeology
1.06(g)	Freshwater Aquatic Surveys
1.06(h)	Bat Surveys
1.07	Attitude, Opinion, and Community Value Studies (Public Involvement)
1.10	Traffic Analysis
3.01	Two-Lane or Multi-lane Rural Roadway Design
3.02	Two-Lane or Multi-lane urban Roadway Design
3.06	Traffic Operations Studies
3.07	Traffic Operations Design
3.08	Landscape Architecture Design
3.10	Utility Coordination
3.13	Facilities for Bicycles and Pedestrians
3.15	Highway Lighting
3.16	Value Engineering (VE)
4.01(a)	Minor Bridge Design
4.02	Major Bridge Design
4.04	Hydraulic and Hydrological Studies (Bridges)
5.01	Land Surveying
5.02	Engineering Surveying
5.08	Overhead/Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE)
6.01(a)	Soil Survey Studies
6.02	Bridge Foundation Studies
6.04(a)	Laboratory Testing of Roadway Construction Materials
6.04(b)	Field Testing of Roadway Construction Materials
6.05	Hazardous Waste Site Assessment Studies
8.01	Construction Engineering and Supervision
9.01	Erosion, Sedimentation, and Pollution Control Plan
9.03	Field Inspection for Erosion Control

4.

Scope:

a.

b.

Project Description & Project Justification Statement Traffic Engineering

i.

ii.

Traffic projections request, Traffic Data Report, Traffic Forecasting

Traffic Analysis for operational features

c.

d.

e.

f.

g.

h.

i.

j.

Environmental Survey Boundary

Early activities: Property Owner Access Notification Letter, Cultural Resources Notification letter, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Letter, Waters of the US

Fieldwork for Land Survey, Archaeology, Ecology, and History

Resource Survey Reports for Archaeology, Ecology, and History

Land/topographical Survey Database

Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment for Underground Storage Tanks/Hazardous Waste Report Preliminary Right of Way (ROW) cost estimate & concept level utility cost estimate

GDOT concept report

14

RFQ2025-31

k.

l.

m.

n.

o.

p.

q.

r.

s.

t.

u.

v.

w.

x.

y.

z.

Avoidance and Minimization Measures Meeting

Technical study for Archaeology, Ecology, and History

Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment for Underground Storage Tanks/Hazardous Waste Report if

needed

Utility coordination per Utilities Accommodation Procedures & Policy Manual

Design Variances, if needed

Lighting design, if needed

Utility and Construction cost estimate annual updates

Preliminary Field Plan Review

Detour impact coordination, report, and associated items for detour

NEPA document

Location & Design report, if needed

ROW plans

ROW acquisition

Final Field Plan Review

Environmental permitting & updates

Plans, Specifications, and Estimate Package

1. Construction phase

i.

ii.

iii.

iv.

v.

vi.

vii.

viii.

ix.

x.

Assist with City and selected contractor contract preparation

Coordinate the preconstruction meeting with the selected contractor

Provide responses to questions during the bidding for City approval

Assist with the construction phase coordination

Provide laboratory and field tests of necessary roadway construction materials

Review Contractor’s Pay Application and make payment recommendations to the City

Assist with compliance with specifications and submit reports to the City

Provide engineering services requested by the City during construction of the project

Coordinate the final inspection and final punch item list for review and approval by the City

Assemble project’s closeout documents and submit to the City with applicable recommendations.

7.

Related Key Team Leaders:

A.

B.

C.

D.

E.

Design

Environment

Utilities

Survey

Bridge

8.

Timeline:

a.

b.

c.

d.

Notice to Proceed with Preliminary Engineering: September 1, 2025 Concept Approval Calendar Year 2027

Right of Way Authorization Fiscal Year 2028

Construction Authorization Fiscal Year 2029

15

RFQ2025-31

EXHIBIT IICERTIFICATION FORM

I, __________________________, being duly sworn, state that I am ______________________ (title) of ________

___________________________________                                                          (firm) and hereby duly certify that I have read and understand the

information presented in the attached proposal and any enclosure and exhibits thereto.

Initial each box below indicating certification.  The person initialing must be the same person who signs the Certification Form.  (If unable to initial any box for any reason, place an “X” in the applicable box and attach a statement explaining the non-certification. The City will review and make a determination as to whether or not the firm shall be considered further or disqualified).

I further certify that to the best of my knowledge the information given in response to the Request for Qualifications is full, complete and truthful.

I further certify that the submitting firm and any principal employee of the submitting firm has not, in the immediately preceding five (5) years, been convicted of any crime of moral turpitude or any felony offense, nor has had their professional license suspended, revoked or been subjected to disciplinary proceedings, nor is any team members/principals currently under indictment for any reason related to actions on public infrastructure projects.

I further certify that I understand that Firms included on the current Federal list of firms suspended or debarred are not eligible for selection and that the submitting firm has not, in the immediately preceding five (5) years, been suspended or debarred from contracting with any federal, state or local government agency, and further, that the submitting firm is not now under consideration for suspension or debarment from any such agency.

I further certify that the submitting firm has not in the immediately preceding five (5) years been defaulted in any federal, state or local government agency contract and further, that the submitting firm is not now under any notice of intent to default on any such contract, nor has been removed from a contract or failed to complete a contract as assigned due to cause or default.

I further certify that the firm or any affiliate(s) has not been involved in any arbitration, litigation, mediation, dispute review board or other dispute resolution proceeding with a client, business partner, or government agency in the last five (5) years involving an amount in excess of $500,000 related to performance on public infrastructure projects.

I further certify that there are not any pending regulatory inquiries that could impact our ability to provide services if we are the selected consultant.

I further certify that there are no possible conflicts of interest created by our consideration in the selection process or by our involvement in the project.

I further certify that the submitting firm’s annual average revenue for the past five (5) years is sufficient to allow the services to be delivered effectively by our firm and that there are no trends in the revenue which may be concerning other than normal market fluctuations.

I further certify that in regards to Audit and Accounting System Requirements, that the submitting firm:

I.

II.

III. IV.

Has an accounting system in place to meet requirements of 48 CFR Part 31 and, in the case of non-profit organizations, OMB Circular A-122.

Has submitted its yearly Certified Public Accountant overhead audit if it currently has an aggregate contract amount exceeding $250,000.

Has no significant outstanding deficient audit findings from previous contracts with the City that have not been resolved.

Is responsible for being reasonably assured that all sub-consultant(s) presented as a part of the proposed team are similarly in compliance with the above requirements.

I acknowledge, agree and authorize, and certify that the proposer acknowledges, agrees and authorizes, that the City may, by means that either deems appropriate, determine the accuracy and truth of the information provided by the proposer and that the City may contact any individual or entity named in the Statement of Qualifications for the purpose of verifying the information supplied therein.

I acknowledge and agree that all of the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is submitted for the express purpose of inducing the City to award a contract.

A material false statement or omission made in conjunction with this proposal is sufficient cause for suspension or debarment from further contracts, ordenial or rescission of any contract entered into based upon this proposal thereby precluding the firm from doing business with, or performing work for,the State of Georgia.  In addition, such false statement or omission may subject the person and entity making the proposal to criminal prosecution underthe laws of the State of Georgia of the United States, including but not limited to O.C.G.A. §16-10-20, 18 U.S.C. §§1001 or 1341.

Sworn and subscribed before me

_______________________________________

This _____ day of ________, 20___.

____________________________________

NOTARY PUBLIC

Signature

My Commission Expires:

_________________

NOTARY SEAL

16

RFQ2025-31

EXHIBIT III

GEORGIA SECURITY AND IMMIGRATION COMPLIANCE ACT AFFIDAVIT

Consultant’s Name:
Address:
Solicitation No./Contract No.:	RFQ-2025-31
Solicitation/Contract Name:	GDOT 0019357, Bulloch County, SR 67; SR 73 & CS 699/Zetterower Avenue @ Little Lotts Creek

CONSULTANT AFFIDAVIT

By executing this affidavit, the undersigned Consultant verifies its compliance with O.C.G.A. § 13-10-91, stating affirmatively that the individual, entity or corporation which is engaged in the physical performance of services on behalf of the City of Statesboro has registered with, is authorized to use and uses the federal work authorization program commonly known as E-Verify, or any subsequent replacement program, in accordance with the applicable provisions and deadlines established in O.C.G.A. § 13-10-91.

Furthermore, the undersigned Consultant will continue to use the federal work authorization program throughout the contract period and the undersigned Consultant will contract for the physical performance of services in satisfaction of such contract only with sub-consultants who present an affidavit to the Consultant with the information required by O.C.G.A. § 13-10-91(b).  Consultant  hereby  attests  that  its  federal  work  authorization  user  identification  number  and  date  of authorization are as follows:

____________________________________________

Federal Work Authorization User Identification Number (EEV/E-Verify Company Identification Number)

___________________________________________

Name of Consultant

I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that theforegoing is true and correct

____________________________________________

Printed Name (of Authorized Officer or Agent of Consultant)

____________________________________________

Signature (of Authorized Officer or Agent)

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME ON THIS THE

_____ DAY OF ______________________, 201_

________________________________________

Notary Public

My Commission Expires: ___________________

___________________________

Date of Authorization

_______________________________________

Title (of Authorized Officer or Agent of Consultant)

___________________________

Date Signed

[NOTARY SEAL]

Rev. 11/01/15

17

RFQ-484-2025-31

EXHIBIT IV

Area Class Summary Example

Respondents should complete a table similar to the below and indicate by placing an “X” in the appropriate column indicating the firm which meets each required area class for each specific project with particular emphasis on the area classes which the Prime must hold as well as the sub-consultants. The below table is a full listing of all area classes.  Since no single advertisement would require every area class, Respondents should delete all the area classes which are not applicable

to the project they are pursuing and only include the ones applicable.  Particular attention should be paid to the date that consultants certificate expires.

Area  Class #	Area Class Description	Prime Consultant Name	Sub- Consultant #1 Name	Sub- Consultant #2 Name	Sub- Consultant   #3 Name	Sub- Consultant   #4 Name	Sub- Consultant   #5 Name	Sub- Consultant   #6 Name
	DBE – Yes/No ->
	Prequalification Expiration Date
1.01	Statewide Systems Planning
1.02	Urban Area and Regional Transportation Planning
1.03	Aviation Systems Planning
1.04	Mass and Rapid Transportation Planning
1.05	Alternate Systems Planning
1.06(a)	NEPA
1.06(b)	History
1.06(c)	Air Quality
1.06(d)	Noise
1.06(e)	Ecology
1.06(f)	Archaeology
1.06(g)	Freshwater Aquatic Surveys
1.06(h)	Bat Surveys
1.07	Attitude, Opinion, and Community Value Studies (Public Involvement)
1.08	Airport Master Planning (AMP)
1.09	Location Studies
1.10	Traffic Analysis
1.11	Traffic and Toll Revenue Studies
1.12	Major Investment Studies
1.13	Non-Motorized transportation Planning
2.01	Mass Transit Program (Systems Management)
2.02	Mass Transit Feasibility and Technical Studies
2.03	Mass Transit Vehicle and Propulsion System
2.04	Mass Transit Controls, Communication and Information Systems
2.05	Mass Transit Architectural Engineering
2.06	Mass Transit Unique Structures
2.07	Mass Transit Electrical and Mechanical System
2.08	Mass Transit Operations Management and Support Services
2.09	Airport Design (AD)
2.10	Mass Transit Program (Systems Marketing)
3.01	Two-Lane or Multi-lane Rural Roadway Design
3.02	Two-Lane or Multi-lane urban Roadway Design
3.03	Multi-Lane Urban Roadway Widening and Reconstruction
3.04	Multi-lane Rural Interstate Limited Access Design
3.05	Multi-lane Urban Interstate Limited Access Design
3.06	Traffic Operations Studies
3.07	Traffic Operations Design
3.08	Landscape Architecture Design

18

RFQ2025-31

3.09	Traffic Control Systems Analysis, Design and Implementation
3.10	Utility Coordination
3.11	Architecture
3.12	Hydraulic and Hydrological Studies (Roadway)
3.13	Facilities for Bicycles and Pedestrians
3.14	Historic Rehabilitation
3.15	Highway and Outdoor Lighting
3.16	Value Engineering (VE)
3.17	Toll Facilities Infrastructure Design
4.01	Minor Bridge Design
4.02	Major Bridge Design
4.04	Hydraulic and Hydrological Studies (Bridges)
4.05	Bridge Inspection
5.01	Land Surveying
5.02	Engineering Surveying
5.03	Geodetic Surveying
5.04	Aerial Photography
5.05	Photogrammetry
5.06	Topographic Remote Sensing
5.07	Cartography
5.08	Overhead/Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE)
6.01(a)	Soil Survey Studies
6.01(b)	Geological and Geophysical Studies
6.02	Bridge Foundation Studies
6.03	Hydraulic and Hydrologic Studies (Soils & Foundation)
6.04(a)	Laboratory Testing of Roadway Construction Materials
6.04(b)	Field Testing of Roadway Construction Materials
6.05	Hazardous Waste Site Assessment Studies
8.01	Construction Engineering and Supervision
9.01	Erosion, Sedimentation, and Pollution Control Plan
9.02	Rainfall and Runoff Reporting
9.03	Field Inspection for Erosion Control

19

RFQ2025-31

ATTACHMENT 1

Submittal Formats for the City Engineering Projects

# of Pages Allowed

A.

Cover Page

Administrative Requirements

->

1

1.

Basic Company Information

bb.

cc.

dd.

ee.

ff.

gg.

hh.

Company name

Company Headquarter Address Contact Information

Company Website

Georgia Addresses

Staff

Ownership

Excluded

2.

3.

4.

Notarized Certification Form (Exhibit II) for Prime

Notarized Georgia Security and Immigration Compliance Act Affidavit (Exhibit III) Signed Cover Page of any Addenda Issued

->

->

->

1

1

1 (each addenda)

B.

Experience and Qualifications

1.

Project Manager

a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

Education

Registration

Relevant engineering experience

Relevant project management experience

Relevant experience using GDOT specific processes, etc.

2

2.

Key Team Leader Experience

a.

b.

c.

d.

Education

Registration

Relevant experience in applicable resource area

Relevant experience using GDOT specific processes, etc.

1 (each)

3.

Prime’s Experience

a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

f.

Client name, project location, and dates

Description of overall project and services performed Duration of project services provided

Experience using GDOT specific processes, etc. Clients current contact information

Involvement of Key Team Leaders

2

4.

Area Class Table and Notice of  Professional Consultant Qualifications for Prime and Sub-Consultants

->

Excluded

C.

Resources/Workload Capacity

1.

Overall Resources

a.

b.

c.

Organization chart

Primary office to handle project and staff description of office and benefits of office Narrative on Additional Resource Areas and Ability

->

Excluded

1

2.

3.

Project Manager Commitment Table

Key Team Leaders Project commitment table

->

->

20

Excluded Excluded

Commodity Codes

• NAICS 237310Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction

* Disclaimer: Government BidHub provides information on bids, RFPs (Requests for Proposals), and RFQs (Requests for Qualifications) solely for convenience and informational purposes. This site is not an official public notice board. For official details, responses, or inquiries, please contact the relevant government agency directly.